notification of Bekic’s paper having been accepted

The author thanks for the revised version of the paper on "Survey of Macro Processors."

The author is enclosing a revised version of his paper "A Survey of Macro Processors" to be considered for Annual Review. He did not agree with all Halpern's comments, but he is very grateful to Mr. Halpern.

The author sends copies of three just-received contributions to ARAP Volume 6, informs on editorial responsibility for deciding on the publishability for each of the papers.

argumentations on the need for broad advertising of ARAP (Annual Review in Automatic Programming) in different computer editions; surprise apropos the problems with Zagatsky’s translation

The author has read the paper by Wilkins and Schilder and he thinks that the Editorial Board should not take it for publication. The paper does not appropriate to the reseach area of the Annual Review.

The author sends to all the editors a copy of the first set of page proofs for Volume 5, the other sets will be along shortly. Remarks are listed.

The author apologizes for the delay in sending the copy of Dr.Erickson's paper. The paper must be approved by SDC security office. With the precedent established, things should go much faster in the future.

The author thanks for publishing his paper in the Annual Review and sends the revised full manuscript.

The author sends the draft of his article for the Annual Review. He goes over it again in September after the IFIP and ACM meetings.

C.Shaw sends two papers to all the editors and asks them to send comments on Fujino's paper to Tony Brooker as responsible editor, and comments on Olle's paper to Mark Halpern.

The authors send two copies of promised paper on the formal description of PL/1. They sent one copy to each member of the Editorial Board.

Chief Book Editor of Pergamon Press apologizes for the delay in printing of Volume 5 due to some difficulties in the printing house. He promises that the date of completion of printing will be February.

The author tells of the similarity of scientific interests and sends his paper; proposes to meet Ershov ehen he comes to California

informing of the demise of Mr. R. Goodman and the problems with publishing of the series of books, "Annual Review in Automatic Programming", that he edited; asking Ershov to be a member of the Editorial Board