H.Goodman informs A.P.Ershov that he had sent his reviewer's report before he has received the strict rules of reviewing.

I.Parsons has received the paper to be reviewed and will soon send his report.

No paper to review received as yet by L.Frampton.

K.Culik cannot complete his Reviewer's Report in due time.

by A.P.Ershov to those reviewers whose reports have not yet come. The letter contains advices on further activities. The Russian original, the English official text and its carbon-copy.

by H.Bowlden to the Reviewer's Report on the paper submitted by Hu Jiafu et al.

by J.G.P.Barnes to his Report on a paper.

by G.Madea to his Reviewer's Report. The author indicates also the field of his preferences for reviewing.

by D. De Groot to comments on J.L.Keedy's paper.

to G.Marchuk as to his participation in the Congress.

E.Nijmeijer gives his short evaluation of the paper he had been asked to referee.

R.Mason informs that he has already sent his Reviewer's Report.

of the "Michael Jackson Systems Limited" firm signed by M.Jackson.

by Prof. Schlageter to a copy of his, previously sent, Reviewer's Report.

by R.Brice to his Reviewer's Report on H.Humeno's paper and to W.Anderson's Report on H.Kameda's paper.

by Th.Gannon to his Reviewer's Report.

of the University of Strathclyde, Department of Computer Science.

by P.Hibbard informing that the manuscript of the paper and the Reviewer's Report on it are sent under separate covers.

by R.Scowen to his brief but positive review of a paper.

by L.Trilling to his Reviewer's Report.