The author thanks for the revised version of the paper on "Survey of Macro Processors."

The author is enclosing a revised version of his paper "A Survey of Macro Processors" to be considered for Annual Review. He did not agree with all Halpern's comments, but he is very grateful to Mr. Halpern.

The author sends copies of three just-received contributions to ARAP Volume 6, informs on editorial responsibility for deciding on the publishability for each of the papers.

The Editorial Board has decided that the addressee's paper would not be appropriate for publication in the Annual Review. It is "far beyond the interests of our readers".

Chris. Shaw is enclosing a copy of Brooker's comments on the Fujino paper (in Attachment), and asks Professor Ershov to be the responsible editor for Erickson's contribution.

The author informs that the Hassler's paper on compilers is "quite valuable as PhD. Dissertation but I don't think it should be considered for publication in ARAP"

The author thanks for accepting his contribution for Volume 6 and sends his final revised paper.

The author, referring to an expert opinion, informs about a nonacceptance of the addressee's paper. The reviewer suggests the first part of the paper to submit for publication in a technical monthly journal.

The author apologizes for the delay in sending the copy of Dr.Erickson's paper. The paper must be approved by SDC security office. With the precedent established, things should go much faster in the future.

C.Shaw sends two papers to all the editors and asks them to send comments on Fujino's paper to Tony Brooker as responsible editor, and comments on Olle's paper to Mark Halpern.

The author is taking steps to expedite the decision about the addressee's paper and he hopes it will be done in a couple of weeks.

The author wants to know about a decision on his paper.

The author says that the addressee's paper has been sent to the publisher (Pergamon Press) and soon the addressee should be receiving page proofs.

The author trusts that the final draft of his paper has been received by addressee.

The author is sorry to say that the addressee's article would not be appropriate for publication in the Annual Review. The reviewer's comments are attached.

C.Shaw sends four papers by W.H.Burge to all the editors and asks their opinions about considering any of the four papers for publication in ARAP. He informs on completion of the editorial work for Volume 6. He raises perplexing questions about publisher and Volume 7.

Author informs that the addressee's paper has been accepted for publication in the Annual Review. It's necessary to react to Bob Floyd's comments and to send the revised document to Mr. Alan J. Steel, Chief Book Editor of Pergamon Press, who will be expecting it.

Director of Britannica Reviews suggests to the Editorial Board of ARAP collaboration in publishing Annual Review series. He represents a compensation plan and a few editorial changes that would be desirable in the series.

The author politely rejects a proposal of Britannica Reviews. The Editorial Board of Annual Review considers that the current arrangement with Pergamon Press is preferable.

This is a covered letter. The author encloses a copy of the first Richard Goodman Memorial Lecture by Lord Bowden. He gives Lord Bowden's address for direct correspondence.