The letter has six topics, in particular, the author agrees that McGee's paper is an excellent one, that it's necessary to help to the Goodman's Found, but he suggests to donate half the royalties for three years. He asks about a final decision on Colouris's paper.

The author invites the addressee to submit a paper on AED System to be considered for publication in the 1968 issue of the Annual Review. The deadline for contributions to this issue is April 1968.

The author invites Harry Markowitz to submit a paper on Simscript II to be considered for publication in the 1968 issue of the Annual Review. The deadline for contributions to this issue is April 1968.

The author invites to submit a paper on a survey of on-line systems for the Air Force Office of Scientific Research. This paper will be considered for publication in the Review.

This is an invitation to submit a paper on Simscript II to be considered for publication in the 1968 issue of the Annual Review. The deadline for contributions is April 1968.

The author regrets that he has to refuse to submit his paper on Simscript II for the forthcoming issue of Review. He recommends Phil Kiviat as a potential writer of such an article.

Reply to the letter of 15th September is delayed because of the author's moving from Manchester to Essex. The author discusses the results of contacts with potential authors, asks what the position is about the contribution of G. Colouris.

The author decided to include the Coulouris' paper in Volume 6 of the Annual Review because the paper needs the revision. Comments on this paper are attached. The author agrees with the addressee and Ershov that they will not accept papers outside their area.

It is a "formal letter" of the acceptance of Coulouris' paper for Volume 6 of the Annual Review.

The author thanks for the copy of the addressee's paper and asks the addressee if his paper is intending for publication in the Annual Review or not.

The author sends his article to an addressee following the Dr.Bolliet's advice.

Christopher Shaw reports to members of the Editorial Board that ARAP Volume 5 has received its first excellent critical mention. He hopes that Volume 5 will be out by spring or early summer of 1968. A copy of the articles' list for the Volume 6 is attached.

C.Shaw, as responsible editor, is considering rejecting the Petr Partyk's paper on the basis of the general comments which are enclosed. He asks members of the Editorial Board to send any comments on this action ASAP.

The author is sorry to say that the Editorial Board has decided the addressee's paper would not be appropriate for publication in the Annual Review.

The author thanks for the addressee's contribution. He distributes copies of the article to other members of the Editorial Board. After reviewing the paper editors will say their decision as to its publishability ASAP.

C.Shaw is enclosing a copy of a paper by E.Kindler and asks A.Ershov to send his comments on this paper to Mr. Inada as a responsible editor for this contribution. The author is enrolling A.Ershov as a member of SIGPLAN and suggests him to pay the $6 dues when he renews his ACM membership.

C.Shaw sends a copy of a paper by Kiichi Fujino to all the members of the Editorial Board. He asks them to send comments on a paper's publishability to the responsible editor Professor Brooker.

The author thanks for the addressee's contribution. After editors' reviewing and a decision as to the paper's publishability, he promises that the full paper's translation from the Japanese will be paid for by the publisher.

The author sends the abstract of K.Fujino's paper. When the paper is accepted he must find out the professional translator. He wants to know the details of receiving pay for the translation.

The author thanks for the letter of February 14. He intends to update his paper and wants to know the deadlines.