Reply to the letter of 15th September is delayed because of the author's moving from Manchester to Essex. The author discusses the results of contacts with potential authors, asks what the position is about the contribution of G. Colouris.

The author decided to include the Coulouris' paper in Volume 6 of the Annual Review because the paper needs the revision. Comments on this paper are attached. The author agrees with the addressee and Ershov that they will not accept papers outside their area.

The letter is addressed to all the members of the Editorial Board of the Annual Review. The copy of a paper by P.J.Brown submitted for publication in Volume 6 is sent.

It is a "formal letter" of the acceptance of Coulouris' paper for Volume 6 of the Annual Review.

The author thanks for the copy of the addressee's paper and asks the addressee if his paper is intending for publication in the Annual Review or not.

The author sends his article to an addressee following the Dr.Bolliet's advice.

Christopher Shaw reports to members of the Editorial Board that ARAP Volume 5 has received its first excellent critical mention. He hopes that Volume 5 will be out by spring or early summer of 1968. A copy of the articles' list for the Volume 6 is attached.

C.Shaw, as responsible editor, is considering rejecting the Petr Partyk's paper on the basis of the general comments which are enclosed. He asks members of the Editorial Board to send any comments on this action ASAP.

The author is sorry to say that the Editorial Board has decided the addressee's paper would not be appropriate for publication in the Annual Review.

The author thanks for the addressee's contribution. He distributes copies of the article to other members of the Editorial Board. After reviewing the paper editors will say their decision as to its publishability ASAP.

The author sends his paper for a publication in Annual Review, asks to duplicate it.

C.Shaw is enclosing a copy of a paper by E.Kindler and asks A.Ershov to send his comments on this paper to Mr. Inada as a responsible editor for this contribution. The author is enrolling A.Ershov as a member of SIGPLAN and suggests him to pay the $6 dues when he renews his ACM membership.

C.Shaw sends a copy of a paper by Kiichi Fujino to all the members of the Editorial Board. He asks them to send comments on a paper's publishability to the responsible editor Professor Brooker.

The author thanks for the addressee's contribution. After editors' reviewing and a decision as to the paper's publishability, he promises that the full paper's translation from the Japanese will be paid for by the publisher.

The author sends the abstract of K.Fujino's paper. When the paper is accepted he must find out the professional translator. He wants to know the details of receiving pay for the translation.

The author supports the publication of the paper by K.Fujino.

The author has no comments to Kindler's paper and leaves it up to the addressee to make a decision.

The author will send copies of the addressee's thesis to the other members of the Editorial Board. If they decide to publish it, the addressee must to prepair a final draft about a month later.

The author thanks for the letter of February 14. He intends to update his paper and wants to know the deadlines.

The author thanks for the revised version of the paper on "Survey of Macro Processors."