Important administrative and editorial procedures are discussed. The author consents to all of Ershov's suggestions.

Author constructively criticizes Mr.Bemer's article which is "for the most part devoted to the political history of ALGOL in the USA rather than the scientific history of ALGOL in the computational world" as well as expresses his opinion about papers of Brown and Sanderson.

Author gives detailed comments on the Bob Bemer's article.

Author briefly recenses the R.Bemer's article "A history of ALGOL".

Author gives his opinion on the Bemer's article "History of ALGOL": "I won't make any recommendation on whether or not to publish, but it should be retitled."

Reply to the letter of 28 March. Author continues discussion of the Bemer's paper "History of ALGOL". They will have to choose between publishing it with the title changed and rejecting it.

The author supports the addressee's and Ershov's rejection of Brown's paper. He also reiterates his support for publication of the other papers.

by R.Bemer on J.Diaz-Herrera's and R.Flude's paper.

The author sends a copy of the revised version of Bemer's paper on ALGOL. He thinks it's necessary to accept his paper for publication. Mr.Halpern and the author are going to write a preface for the next volume, paying tribute to Goodman's part in the history of the Annual Review.