Invitation to give a lecture at the Seminar on Programming Languages and to send the title of the talk ASAP

Thanks for contribution in the symposium organization; regrets that due to visa problems the addressee could not attend it

Confirmation of the invitation to Grenoble and request to inform of the visit schedule

The author tells of the similarity of scientific interests and sends his paper; proposes to meet Ershov ehen he comes to California

The fifth volume of Annuel Review has been published. The volume is a handsome one and seems to be very well printed. The authors have sent to Pergamon much of the contents of the next volume. They are still dissatisfied by the paucity of contributions from outside the English-speaking community.

The author politely rejects a proposal of Britannica Reviews. The Editorial Board of Annual Review considers that the current arrangement with Pergamon Press is preferable.

The author encloses copies of two papers submitted for publication in the ARAP.

Before volume 6 to be issued shortly the authors review accomplishments and plans for the future. In particular, they are disappointed by the very small number of contributions from outside the United States. In this connection the following editors are noted: Floyd, Brooker, Bolliet, Ershov and Inada.

M.Halpern discusses results of the last few months, personnel changes in the Editorial Board, a preparing of the volume 7. There is a handwritten request to A.Ershov about getting papers for volume 7. The Attachment contains Royalty Statement from Pergamon Press and a list of contributions for volume 7&later.

The author suggests to open the account for payments from Pergamon Press to all the editors of ARAP as "joint tenants". In order to open such account each of the editors must fill a set of forms. There is a handwritten salutation to A.Ershov in the end of the letter.

The author has received an advance copy of volume 6 and discusses the contributions for Volume 7. Status of these contributions is represented in the Attachment.

The letter is addressed to all the editors of the Annual Review which should have received a copy of Volume 7, part 1. The status of contributions to the Review for Volume 7 & later (in an Attachment) is discussed.

Discission of the recent developments in the "Annual Review..." publishing matters